Oryx and Crake: Foils to Jimmy

In this blog, I am going to refer to both Snowman and Jimmy as Jimmy. When discussing his character, I am discussing traits that are apparent in both Jimmy and Snowman.

Oryx and Crake are both foils to Jimmy and the most obvious thing they bring out of him is his humanity. While they have accepted most aspects of humanity, Jimmy’s struggle with human nature is central to most of his conflicts.

The development of Oryx’s character has revealed character traits in Jimmy that had previously been hidden. The story of her youth is the first major development we get into her character. We learn that her background is opposite to Jimmy’s: she is from a poor farming town that probably didn’t even know “Compounds” existed. She was forced to work from a young age, and her intelligence seems to have been considered of no consequence: whether she was smart or not did not affect her ability to sell flowers or make porn films. Despite this, her view of humanity is very positive and accepting. When Oryx recounts the death of Uncle En, the man who bought Oryx from her mother, she says “I cried when I heard about [his death]”, and she was thankful that “He could have done much worse things to me, and he didn’t do them” (136). This clashes with Jimmy’s reaction to Uncle En’s business: “Jimmy was outraged by this the first time he heard about it” “He’d whammed the furniture” (Atwood 119). Oryx is able to understand Uncle En, and focuses on his acts of generosity (if it can be called that). Jimmy, however, reacts with outrage at learning a new example of the darkness in humanity.

Jimmy’s reaction is the more relatable. I would be angry if I learnt one of my friends had grown up without parents because someone bought them as a child. Jimmy displays emotion, as he can’t wrap his head around some of the things people have done. However, he is also not above these things: he watched enough child pornography to randomly stumble along a video with Oryx in it (90). He also watched public executions, and reality television about people who had chosen to be euthanized (83). This builds Jimmy as a very human character; he is very much a part of human emotion, conflict, and hypocrisy.


All of this is clear thanks to Oryx and Crake. They both, unlike Jimmy, seem above humanity. They have both understood it and moved past it. Oryx shows this through her her forgivingness and acceptance. She has seen the worst of people, accepted what the conflicts and dark motives that exist in them, and sees the bright side of humanity despite its countless flaws. Crake seems above humanity because of the objectiveness he can keep when considering it. He did create a superhuman race after all. What Jimmy tells us of this creation shows how Crake looks at the human race. He does away with things that bring humans happiness to replace them with more logical systems. Jimmy does not like some of these ideas, because they are very inhuman, and he takes Crake up on his plan to do away with love. While Jimmy gets frustrated, Crake maintains an objective view that defends his plan: “There’s a courtship behaviour in my plan […] except that it would always succeed” (166). This infuriates Jimmy so much that he comments “These arguments had to be played through as a game: if he lost his temper, Crake won” (168). Jimmy represents a natural human response to such a situation: we do not want to see things that make us happy disappear. However Crake forgets his instinct to value everything human. Instead of promoting his own genes, creates a new race that is not better endowed with paths to human definitions of happiness, but that objectively works more logically.

Comments

  1. Hi Luke. Great blog post, I’m glad you chose to refer to Jimmy/Snowman as just Jimmy- it made the post much less confusing. I completely agree with the majority of your points particularly the one about Oryx’s reaction to Uncle En’s death. This really frustrated and saddened me because Oryx was completely blinded by the poor treatment she received from him. My take on why she felt this way was perhaps that it was a subtle case of Stockholm syndrome where hostages form physiological alliances/bonds with their captor(s). Although Oryx didn’t necessarily feel like she was being held captive and wasn’t constantly abused, the treatment she received was definitely abnormal and her reaction to it really shows that she was either oblivious to this or choose to ignore it.

    As for Crake, I am in agreement with how you presented him as Jimmy’s foil. I also think that Crake is very blunt in comparison to Jimmy in the sense that Jimmy shows that he is an emotional person who reacts to situations as most people would whereas it seems that Crake brushes most situations off. Even when Jimmy’s mother left, Crake didn't seem to be very sympathetic and simply stated that he saw it coming.

    Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a very insightful analysis on the three main characters' views on humanity. I liked that you included many quotations to support your findings. I would like to further examine the relationship between Oryx and Jimmy.

    I believe their relationship is built on the fact that they are foils of each other, since opposites supposedly attract. As you said, Oryx is a highly optimistic and understanding person. She believes the "double sale" of her and her brother was evidence of her mother's love (146). She is grateful for Jack because he taught her English in exchange for sex (173). Even though Oryx endures many hardships, she still manages to remain optimistic at the end of it all.

    This contrasts Jimmy's character, which is shaped by many of his own hardships. His mother left him when he was young, and took his one friend, a rakunk, with her. He also grew up isolated from his father and classmates because of his linguistic mindset. While Oryx accepts her hardships and forgives society's corruption, Jimmy is a pessimist and moves through life with self-pity. He tells women he is a lost cause and emotionally dyslexic to make them sympathize with him and to help him gain perspective on life (230). However, he manipulates them in such a way to end the relationship, and the process is repeated again. Although Jimmy had a tough childhood, he does not move on like Oryx does. Instead, he constantly relives it through his lovers, relishing his self-pity and their sympathy.

    Jimmy is attracted to Oryx, I believe, because she treats him differently and does not buy his act. She "refused to feel what he wanted her to feel" (233). She also gave him different perspectives, like how his mother might have left for reasons he never thought of before. Perhaps her ability to move on or to accept reality, traits Jimmy does not possess, are causes of his attraction to her.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post, and very well thought-out.

    I think Oryx goes beyond just being forgiving. She seems emotionally disconnected from it. She doesn't seem to suggest that she disliked her time in the child porn industry, even when she was being coerced into off-camera sex. It wasn't good or bad, it just was. Oryx in general seems to be more of a mystery to us than Crake; Crake is an archetype. He is the driven, logical, emotionless scientist—your Spock, say. His flaw is his lack of feeling. He wants to make the world a better place, but from an objective standpoint—he is, for instance, willing to sacrifice the existence of love to remove the possibility of heartbreak. Oryx, however, is a mystery. She's a detached, flighty woman, who treats her dark past lightly. She's still around, too—somehow. I know what to expect from Crake, but Oryx is a wild card, and I'm excited about that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oryx and Crake: Themes

Jimmy and Snowman: How a character can change (or not)